Expanding Your Invention’s Coverage: The Smart Move Before Your Patent Issues

Quick Summary

Quick Answer: Before your patent officially issues, you can file a Continuation (CON) or Continuation-in-Part (CIP) to broaden your patent's scope, include additional features, and strengthen your intellectual property protection.

Quick Overview: A Notice of Allowance doesn’t mean you have to settle for just what was approved. By filing a Continuation or CIP, you can refine claims, seek broader protection, and add new improvements before the patent is finalized, ensuring your invention is safeguarded against competitors.

Common Questions & Answers

1. What is a Notice of Allowance?
A Notice of Allowance means the patent examiner has approved your application, and the patent will issue soon—unless you take action to expand it with a CON or CIP.

2. What is a Continuation (CON)?
A CON allows you to file a new application based on the same original patent, but with different or broader claims, giving you additional layers of protection.

3. What is a Continuation-in-Part (CIP)?
A CIP lets you add new subject matter while keeping the original filing date for existing claims, making it perfect for adding improvements or modifications to your invention.

4. Why should I file a CON or CIP before my patent issues?
It gives you a second chance to refine claims, broaden coverage, and ensure competitors can’t design around your patent.

5. Can I file a CON or CIP after my patent issues?
No, once your patent is issued, you lose the ability to file a continuation or CIP based on that application.

Step-by-Step Guide: How to Expand Your Patent Coverage Before Issuance

Step 1: Assess Your Current Patent Scope
Review your allowed claims and identify areas where broader or additional coverage could be beneficial.

Step 2: Determine if a CON or CIP is Right for You
If you want broader claims without new subject matter, file a CON. If you have new improvements, file a CIP.

Step 3: Work with a Patent Attorney
A skilled patent attorney can help craft strong claims to maximize your protection and avoid unnecessary rejections.

Step 4: File Before Your Patent Issues
Timing is crucial. Submit your CON or CIP before paying the issue fee to ensure continuity of your application rights.

Step 5: Monitor & Adjust Your Patent Strategy
After filing, keep an eye on industry trends and potential competitors to see if further adjustments or additional filings are needed.

Historical Context: The Evolution of Patent Continuations

Patent continuation strategies have played a key role in strengthening intellectual property protection for over a century. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) introduced continuation applications to prevent inventors from being locked into a single claim set. In the 20th century, corporations leveraged continuations to expand their monopoly and fortify patent portfolios, a practice still used today.

Famous patent cases, like the Wright brothers' aviation patents, illustrate how continuations helped secure broader claims, ensuring long-term dominance. In modern tech, companies like Apple and IBM frequently use continuations to maintain competitive advantages in evolving markets.

Business Competition Examples

1. Apple Inc.
Apple often files continuations on its patents to cover incremental innovations, ensuring ongoing protection against competitors in the smartphone and computing space.

2. Tesla, Inc.
Tesla uses continuation applications to refine and expand its patents on electric vehicle technology, allowing it to stay ahead in a rapidly changing market.

3. Qualcomm
Qualcomm strategically files CIPs to add improvements to its wireless technology patents, keeping its portfolio relevant despite fast-paced advancements.

4. Pharmaceutical Industry
Drug companies commonly file continuations to broaden patent protection for formulations, ensuring extended market exclusivity.

Discussion: Why Broader Patent Protection Matters

Broad patent coverage is essential to prevent competitors from exploiting loopholes. A well-executed continuation strategy can:

Strengthen defensive capabilities against infringement.
Provide room for licensing opportunities with broader claim coverage.
Allow inventors to capture new improvements without filing entirely new patents.
Prevent competitors from creating workarounds to avoid infringement.

Without a continuation strategy, inventors risk narrow protection, making it easier for competitors to introduce similar products without legal repercussions.

The Debate: Should Every Inventor File a CON or CIP?

Yes, for maximum protection:

Expands patent coverage and strengthens IP strategy.
Provides flexibility to refine claims.
Helps block competitors from easily bypassing your patent.

No, only when necessary:

Adds extra cost and legal complexity.
May not be needed if the original patent already provides sufficient protection.

Takeaways

Don’t rush to issue your patent—consider continuations for broader protection.
A CON can expand your claim scope, while a CIP adds new features.
Filing before issuance is crucial; after that, the opportunity is lost.
Companies use continuations to stay competitive—small inventors should, too.
A well-planned continuation strategy can increase patent value and enforcement power.

Potential Business Hazards

Missed Deadline – If you fail to file a continuation before issuance, you lose the chance for expanded claims.
Increased Costs – Filing CONs and CIPs adds legal expenses, which might not be ideal for small businesses.
Patent Office Scrutiny – The USPTO may challenge claims that appear too broad or overly vague.
Competitor Awareness – Continuation filings are public, alerting competitors to your strategic moves.

Myths and Misconceptions

“Once a patent is allowed, it’s set in stone.”

False! You can still file continuations before issuance to refine and expand coverage.

“Only big corporations need CONs and CIPs.”

Wrong! Startups and solo inventors can use them to maximize their IP assets.

“A continuation is just a duplicate patent.”

No, it allows for modifications and broader protection based on the original filing.

Book & Podcast Recommendations

Patent It Yourself by David Pressman

A comprehensive guide to patenting strategies.

The Inventor’s Guide to Trademarks and Patents by Craig F. Hilliard

Covers practical approaches to protecting your invention.

Patent Baristas Podcast

Insightful discussions on patent law and business strategies.

IP Fridays Podcast

Expert analysis of IP trends and legal updates.

Legal Cases: Continuation & CIP Strategies in Action

Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. v. Hollister Inc. (1988)

Full URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/863/867/329966/
Summary: This case established that filing a continuation application is legitimate as long as it is done in good faith. The ruling confirmed that broadening claims via a continuation does not constitute inequitable conduct.
Relevance: This case provides reassurance to inventors that properly filed continuation applications can be used to expand claim scope without legal risk, as long as they are not misleading.

Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Lemelson Medical, Education & Research Foundation (2002)

Full URL: https://casetext.com/case/symbol-technologies-inc-v-lemelson-medical
Summary: The court ruled that patent applicants cannot unduly delay the prosecution of a patent through repeated continuations, reinforcing limits on the abuse of the continuation process.
Relevance: This case highlights the importance of timely filings and preventing excessive use of continuations to extend patent life unfairly.

In re Henriksen (1968)

Full URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/399/253/166711/
Summary: The court ruled against indefinite continuation chains, establishing that continuation applications should not be used to extend patent protection indefinitely.
Relevance: Inventors must ensure their continuation filings are strategic and compliant with USPTO policies to avoid rejections based on excessive claim extensions.

MPEP § 201.07 (Manual of Patent Examining Procedure)

Full URL: https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/
Summary: The USPTO's manual outlines the proper use of continuation and continuation-in-part applications, ensuring compliance with patent laws.
Relevance: This section serves as a guideline for inventors and patent attorneys on the acceptable use of CON and CIP applications within the U.S. patent system.

Share Your Expertise

Need help navigating patent continuation strategies? Visit http://inventiveunicorn.com for expert guidance.

Wrap Up

Before your patent issues, take a step back and evaluate how you can expand and strengthen your protection with a continuation or CIP. A little extra effort now can provide long-term security and competitive advantage.